Upcoming Events
Event Date Location

Mobile Commerce World

06/24/2013 - 06/26/2013 San Francisco CA

mobile

Subscribe To Latest Posts
Subscribe
Sort Posts By:

Publishers need to get their apps in gear


eMedia Vitals

Apple is rumored to be announcing the fifth generation of its iPad on June 18. Mobile devices account for an increasingly larger share of most publishers’ web traffic – including a whopping 65% for BuzzFeed.  Publishers are delivering 1.7 million digital editions a week built with Adobe’s Digital Publishing Suite – a sixfold increase over the past two years.

It may be time to take this whole mobile thing a bit more seriously.

The elements required to justify greater investment in mobile development are falling into place. More people are reading digital magazines; Adobe says per-publication readership across its DPS-based publications has increased by an average of 80% over the past six months. More devices are coming to market, with models such as the iPad mini and Kindle HD extending into the mass market.

“People are more comfortable reading magazine content on tablets,” Lynly Schambers-Lenox, Adobe’s group product marketing manager for digital publishing, said in a recent interview. “That’s not surprising, and we expect it to continue.”

Read more… 

Media companies focus on centralizing audience data, adopting responsive design

Media Business

The technology to-do list for business media companies is lengthy, but many have made centralized audience databases and responsive design websites a priority in 2013. The goal behind these complex initiatives? To get a simplified view of customers and to reach them wherever they may be, whether at the office or on the go.

Faced with a multitude of technology options that promise to make their companies more profitable or efficient, business media executives must choose their priorities. This year, publishers with different sizes, business models and vertical markets are focusing their efforts on two technology-driven projects in particular: building out centralized audience databases and creating websites using responsive design.

Other technology initiatives remain on the to-do list, of course, including those that will unlock the potential of publishers’ content assets, help companies use powerful analytics or make magazines more exciting for readers and more targeted for advertisers.

But single customer-portrait databases and responsive design hold particular appeal for media companies because of their potential to help address some thorny issues.

Brent Pearson, CTO at UBM Tech, explained that his company has a private cloud solution that combines both a physical data warehouse and applications that can bring together data from different databases. Pearson has spent years consolidating and merging a succession of databases, he said, starting with the division formerly known as UBM Electronics, then adding the electronics business acquired from Canon Communications and now incorporating data from the formerly separate TechWeb division. “The end goal, to have all of UBM Tech in a single-user database, is still months away,” he said.

Continue reading… 

 

IDC: For Mobile Advertising Networks, Era of Dominance Is Over

IDC PMS4colorversion 1 IDC: For Mobile Advertising Networks, Era of Dominance Is Over
IDC Press Release

SAN MATEO, Calif., April 9, 2013 – Mobile publishers such as Facebook, Pandora, and Twitter are rapidly taking over the mobile display advertising market in the United States. Where in past years, ad networks such as Google, Millennial Media, and Apple received most of the spending on mobile display ads, now publishers control the segment, thanks to very strong sales growth in the past year. Facebook, Pandora, Twitter, and The Weather Channel all registered strong sales in 2012 and all (with the exception of Pandora) popped onto the scene from zero sales in 2011. As a result, publishers controlled 52% of U.S. mobile display ad spending in 2012, compared to the 39% they received in 2011. This is one of the results from a newly published International Data Corporation (IDC) report, 2012 U.S. Mobile Advertising Market Sizing and Vendor Market Shares (Doc #240311).

For the full press release click here

Mobile Still an Untapped Opportunity for B-to-B Media

 

Folio

Industry Dive CEO Sean Griffey on what publishers should focus on.

We’re all aware of the rapid ascent of mobile use—particularly for accessing content. Yet, many publishers in b-to-b media have yet to build out a strategy that fully embraces the platform as both a dedicated asset and revenue generator.

This is precisely why Sean Griffey [pictured], along with Ryan Willumson and Eli Dickinson, startedIndustry Dive, a mobile content producer and tech platform. The company has been making aggressive moves to build out mobile-first content verticals and has also begun licensing its technology to help other b-to-b publishers build their own products.

Griffey, who will be a speaker at FOLIO: and min’s MediaMashup summit on April 16 at the Grand Hyatt in New York, shares some of his insights on mobile publishing and what you’re missing if you don’t yet have a strategy in place.

FOLIO: What’s your general impression of how far along b-to-b media is with its mobile initiatives?

Sean Griffey: It’s wildly varied. Some folks have embraced mobile while others haven’t seriously looked at it.

Overall, the response to mobile is eerily similar to how b-to-b responded to the internet in general. When users first started moving online in the 90s, b-to-b media companies had two main responses. They either ignored online because they didn’t see money in it or they immediately tried to replicate their print magazines.

Read more… 

IDG boss Bob Carrigan: ‘The curse of many publishers is they hold on to print for too long’

The Media Briefing

Digital disruption is being felt across the media industry – but the technology market publisher IDG is focused on has put it far closer to the eye of the storm. However, it looks like that hasn’t been a completely bad thing for the company. As IDG Global CEO Bob Carrigan tells me, the firm is geared up for an aggressive approach to new opportunities and is taking a realistic approach to print decline both of which are helping the firm fend off competiton from outside the media business.

Digital disruption stalks the media industry. New technologies threaten to make old ones obsolete every week. So publishers covering the technology industry are closer to the eye of the storm than most.

But tech publisher IDG has turned this to its advantage. The firm’s global CEO Bob Carrigan tells me in a wide-ranging interview that IDG is developing an aggressive approach, taking a realistic approach to the decline of print and fending off competiton from nimble new market entrants.

Continue reading… 

Real-Time Bidding Myths Busted

MediaPost

More and more publishers are contemplating the value of the real-time bidding (RTB) model, but concerns are keeping many from taking full advantage of it. Some publishers fear that with RTB, they are losing control over how access is being granted to their inventory, while at the same time potentially reducing ad quality standards. Others fear the platform is too complex and requires too many resources in order to adapt to publishers’ needs.

It’s not surprising, given the fast-paced and often confusing nature of the space, that these misconceptions have been formed — but they are misguided. The truth is, RTB can represent a meaningful addition to a publisher’s monetization strategy. To do so, however, requires a clear distinction between fact and fiction.

Here is my attempt to clear up some of those myths that publishers hear about RTB:

Myth #1 – What’s good for buyers is bad for sellers.

Fact – Publishers are in the driver’s seat, and make the decisions.

Read more…

Publishers and Advertisers “Grab” Onto Online Video Syndication Models

Janet Stilson - Media Business

To understand the promise of online video distribution companies, one need only look at three trends that have been mushrooming for quite some time. First, TV viewers are increasingly turning to DVR-like experiences online, as they seek to watch quality programming at their own pace. That gravitational pull is strengthened by the habits of a maturing Internet generation who are increasingly turning to attractive viewing options like Hulu, HBOGo, Netflix, TV.com and ABC.com and also integrating second screen experiences into their viewing behavior.

Second, leading online publishers are selling-out the commercial inventory on their own sites and are building ad networks by syndicating their proprietary content to approved advertiser-friendly sites that reach relevant targeted audiences. As these trends gather momentum, a third movement has already passed a tipping point. Most marketers now realize that it’s impossible to depend on their own micro sites to reach a targeted audience efficiently with their branded content. “Those days are long over,” says Alvin Bowles, CEO of Grab Media. His company has developed a business model aimed squarely at these three developments.

Since taking the reins at Grab about 18 months ago after executive roles at AOL, Viacom and Time Warner, Bowles has flipped the company on its proverbial head. Online video syndication of professionally produced video content and advertising are front-and-center in its marketing mission, although the company’s core technology underpinnings remain a unique feature. Grab syndicates content from professional producers of news and information video content including Martha Stewart, the Associated Press, Reuters and NBC/Universal. It also offers up branded entertainment from advertisers. Both forms of content are distributed to Web publishers in need of videos to expand their offerings and serve their audiences’ interests. For many of these sites, Grab provides the video platform as well as the content they deliver.

In addition to enabling publishers to increase their views and available video inventory for their sales networks, Grab sells ad avails on much of the content it distributes, sharing revenues with the publishers and content creators. According to comScore Video Metrix data, Grab had nearly 35 million unique viewers during August. That’s up from 23 million in April, a 52% gain. That makes it “the fastest growing video property on the Web,” claims Bowles.

Grab has also won support from some noteworthy agency executives. “Grab has recorded a significant gain in unique viewers over the past year. That’s very impressive,” says Greg Kahn, EVP and business development director at Optimedia. “There’s value to what they’re doing; Grab is reaching viewers where and when they’re watching online video.

Grab is not the only player in the online video syndication space. Among its closest competitors is AOL On Network (formerly 5 Min), which aggregates both original and syndicated content in the news, lifestyle and entertainment categories. There’s also the News Distribution Network (NDN), which focuses on news; the teen-focused Alloy, and episodic-oriented Blip.tv.

However, Grab distinguishes itself through the use of the metadata technology that is at the core of the company. “We’re leveraging data and technology to [determine] which content should be placed where – and what advertising adjacencies are most appropriate for that content stream,” Bowles explains. The specificity of metadata is key to finding the most appropriate clients for the vast amount of programming in Grab’s archives. It has around 200 different content suppliers. And at any one time, there are 800,000 to 900,000 pieces of content available for use. Advertisers typically pay only for views and the Grab platform appears almost exclusively in “above the fold” positions on partner websites.

“The goal for us is to ensure that editors of mid-tail sites who are focused on passion points – like bestmom.com – can grab content based on their editorial voice. We try to add contextual relevance,” Bowles says. By closely matching the right content to the right site, Grab is able to provide advertisers with “click-through and view-through rates that are higher than what you would expect from industry standards,” says Bowles. ”

Grab certainly has made some important progress, but it has challenges as well. Kahn explains: “There are a number of competitors in the space. But Grab did relatively well in the Newfront/Upfront period, and it’s something we’re taking a look at for our clients.” Bowles says that during the Newfront earlier this year, Grab raked in some seven-figure deals with agencies. All told, its total business was in the eight-figure arena, garnering three to four times more revenue during the ’12 Newfront compared with Newfront 2011.

Despite that notable success, Bowles says he had hoped that the Newfront would drive better CPM and volume growth for the digital video industry overall. “What we saw was media companies bundling video inventory from a multiplatform perspective along with their traditional media. There wasn’t as large a shift into the online video ecosystem as many expected, but it’s clearly a growing priority for marketers and their agencies,” Bowles says. “Grab is a little further down on the daisy chain than we should be, given our size. But agency and advertiser executives we’re speaking with are saying, ‘Yes I want to spend more on online video, but I’m not sure how much of an Upfront commitment I can make.’”

Bowles believes there’s a fair amount of education that still needs to take place among agencies and clients, and the responsibility falls on Grab and its competitors. “But it would also be really helpful if comScore and Nielsen would educate agencies and advertisers with a score card around this ecosystem to which everybody can subscribe,” Bowles says. It all boils down to figuring out what metric is the best yardstick for measuring success. Is it impressions, click-through rates or something else? Agency executives have differing opinions about what’s optimal. To have a measure for online video viewing that is as definitive as Nielsen ratings are for the TV space would better define the buying and selling process for Web video, Bowles believes.

Jack Myers serves as a member of the board of directors of Grab Media. Janet Stilson independently researched and wrote this article.

What marketers want from media- Marketing services valued for lead-gen, but challenges remain

Media Business

Media companies have significant opportunities to help marketers generate leads through the marketing services they offer, according to a new study by Media Business. “Leveraging the Power of Marketing Services” found that 62% of marketers consider lead generation to be their most important objective in purchasing marketing services from media companies, followed by customer acquisition (38%), sales (37%) and brand awareness (35%).

The study was based on an online survey of 231 marketing professionals and other executives during June and July of this year. More than half of the respondents (51%) had such titles as director or manager of marketing/products/communications, with such other titles as exec VP, senior VP or VP of marketing, products and communications. The largest verticals represented included technology companies (24%), manufacturing (17%), agencies (11%) and financial services (9%).

Among other key findings of the study: Marketers view audience reach as a key advantage of publisher marketing services, followed by the ability of media companies to segment their data appropriately for better targeting. Hewlett-Packard Co.’s Enterprise Services division this year rolled out its “Evolve, Compete, Succeed” campaign, targeting international companies needing to update legacy applications. A major component of the campaign was a partnership with the Financial Times that included print ads in the publication’s IT-intensive Connected Business. HP also sponsored the CIO Interviews video series, as well as live FT events.

“Because of our objectives—both to create awareness and demand generation—we wanted to have all these touch points and elements in the campaign,” said Natasha Sandoval, marketing campaign manager for HP Enterprise Services EMEA. One purpose of liaising with the Financial Times, she said, was to “accelerate exposure of our content around messages to potential buyers, the IT audience.”

“When constructing integrated solutions for customers’ objectives, one thing we do hear is, “I didn’t know you did that,’ ” said Michael Friedenberg, president-CEO of IDG Enterprise. “So it is an awareness issue in some instances—where our customers are not aware of how broadly we have evolved our solutions into the marketing services area.”

Friedenberg said technology marketers are avid users of IDG’s marketing services in their efforts to leverage its publications’ content and distribution channels, and to tailor specific marketing programs.

Read more… 

Failure to Beat Nielsen Led Google to Pull Plug on TV Ads

ClickZ

 

Following a four-year effort in the incredibly lucrative TV ad business, Google has decided to pull the plug. Traditional TV ads are out – going forward Google plans to focus exclusively on digital. Google has now tried and failed to disrupt the traditional advertising business in print, radio and television. In part, Google’s TV effort was slow to attract new advertisers and more partners to the platform.

“Video is increasingly going digital and users are now watching across numerous devices. So we’ve made the hard decision to close our TV Ads product over the next few months,” Shishir Mehrotra, VP of product at YouTube and video at Google, wrote in a blog post. “We’ll be doubling down on video solutions for our clients (like YouTube, AdWords for Video, and ad serving tools for web video publishers). We also see opportunities to help users access web content on their TV screens, through products like Google TV.”

“The [satellite] and cable operators have excess unsold inventory so it was partially an experiment,” said Derek Baine, senior analyst at SNL Kagan. But Google had a much bigger target than just TV ad sales – it wanted to compete with Nielsen on ratings.

 

http://bit.ly/RCBWzF

Mobile Opportunities Missed Without Stronger Multichannel Integration

MediaPost

Platforms continue to create a fairly easy process to buy mobile media, but marketers don’t understand the mechanics of integrating media channels and technology. Many still drive mobile ads to a Web site or landing page. Retailers don’t recognize that consumers carrying smartphones stand within 200 feet of their stores, and it’s helpful to retarget a display ad on a publisher’s site or serve up a search ad on Bing, Yahoo, or Google Local or Maps to drive foot traffic into the store. TagMan CRO Nancy Marzouk said the company tested mobile app tag management for iOS and Android that it plans to roll out at the end of July.

“A large percentage of the ecosystem remains clueless about the possibilities of mobile,” she said.”We pushed to develop a mobile tag management system, because a lot of clients believe it’s undervalued, but they don’t have the tools or data to validate it.”

Continue reading…