Upcoming Events
Event Date Location

Internetweek New York

05/20/2013 - 05/27/2013 New York City NY

Digiday Conference & Expo

05/27/2013 - 05/28/2013 New York NY

2013 Cause Marketing Forum Annual Conference

05/29/2013 Chicago IL

CITE Conference & Expo

06/02/2013 - 06/04/2013 San Francisco CA

CMO Strategy Summit

06/04/2013 San Francisco CA

Corporate Social Media Summit

06/12/2013 - 06/13/2013 New York City NY

The Corporate Social Media Summit

06/12/2013 - 06/13/2013 New York City NY

Mobile Commerce World

06/24/2013 - 06/26/2013 San Francisco CA

CIO/CMO Agenda

06/26/2013

ANA Digital & Social Media Conference

07/14/2013 - 07/16/2013 Dana Point CA
Subscribe To Latest Posts
Subscribe
Sort Posts By:

Making the Most of Channel Marketing

Gerald Murray Making the Most of Channel Marketing
Gerald Murray, Research Manager, CMO Advisory Service

A recent IDC study of large IT companies found that, on average, channel revenue was $3.7 billion. The average internal channel marketing staff of 53 managed nearly 22,000 partners, equating to $12 million of revenue per internal staff but only half a million dollar per partner.

Most shocking from the study — these organizations have an average of approximately 15,000 inactive partners. Active partners only constitute 31% of the channel mix, with the remaining 69% being inactive. Given the expense involved in recruiting channel partners and on-boarding their first sales, it is in the vendor’s best interest to identify the best partners across the entire partner population and enable them to step-up to higher levels of sales performance.

Channel Marketing Service and Automation Solutions

The traditional method of assigning business development managers to the top 5% of partners, and others to groups of the second 15% of partners, is not scalable. The business development manager assignment is a fixed cost that requires 35%+ growth rates – and it is hard to predict the winners. As shown in the figure below, in a recent IDC study channel managers rated the effectiveness of BDMs and customized channel marketing programs statistically identical in terms of their effectiveness at producing ROI. Providing access to customized channel marketing to all partners – including the bottom 80% – amortizes costs over a larger revenue base Customized channel marketing enables the winners to self-select and payback is driven by collective success.

Most Effective Resources

IDC%2BChannel%2BManagement%2Bslide Making the Most of Channel Marketing

Source: IDC, The Importance of Customized Channel Marketing, 2011. n=22

Customized channel marketing programs can reduce the complexity of marketing through partners by streamlining channel marketing processes and increasing vendor ability to reach more partners simultaneously. Redundancy can be eliminated, as distribution of messages, campaigns, programs and promotions become part of a menu of interchangeable, additive activities.

Using social network best practices, feedback from partners can be used to determine which activities work best from a partner perspective, and which activities need to be developed. This feedback is equally valuable for vendors and partners to see which customizable channel marketing activities are most effective. For the majority of channel partners, customized channel marketing programs offer much needed help in building their marketing plan.

The full report can be downloaded here.

Market Intelligence on the Move

logo idc eag Market Intelligence on the Move

Rich Vancil

Transformation continues to sweep its way through the marketing function and no “department” within the function is exempt from change. For this month’s CMO Advisor newsletter, we are now focused on the market intelligence area.

Compared to its peer departments, Market Intelligence (MI) enjoys relative stability, as measured by the steadiness of the job description, job security and tenure, and budgets. But there is a groundswell of change — or at least an expressed desire for change. In a recent survey of MI professionals, IDC observes that MI executives are seeking to increase the value they deliver to the organizations they support, and to deliver that value with greater efficiency.

Indeed, it is the sentiment of executives that IDC interviewed that “The market intelligence organization will change more in the next 3 years than it has changed in the past 10 years”. That is a bold statement. To peel it back, here are the top areas of change that the MI profession is seeking to transform.

  • MI executives want to transform their client engagement model and become more “proactive”. In IDC’s opinion, this sentiment stems from MI’s traditional challenge of being a demand-driven organization that is constantly working in “response mode” to numerous requests from their internal customers.
  • The MI area seeks to increase its contributions to corporate strategy and sales enablement.
  • From a process and technology standpoint, MI would like to improve the information “value chain”, from data sourcing to information delivery.
  • MI seeks to provide greater support for long-range business planning.
  • MI seeks to demonstrate more visible / tangible business value for its work output.

Our sense is that MI professionals have a good future vision of their role; one where they are highly efficient, driving strategic as well as tactical business value, and are highly valued by their internal clients across the organization for information and “insights” that positively influence business outcomes.

There are two areas that I believe are the best place for MI Transformation steps to begin. These are echoed by my colleagues at IDC and also validated by our surveys with MI executives. I will describe these and also take a bit of “analyst license” and provide some operational suggestions.

1. Improving support for corporate strategy and long term business decisions. I think that MI professionals would love to get out of the heavy load of short-time, fast response calls for bits and bites of data. What they would like to do is be involved in longer term, meatier analysis that is served at higher levels in the organization and that support important business outcomes. But MI is constrained by their people and processes.
The process changes I would suggest would be first; provide more technology and training for self-service for the run-rate of short and tactical requests. Second, consider greater off-shoring or right-shoring of the “back office” analysis roles within MI, and thereby create more roles for higher level “management – consulting” type MI personnel who can interface with executives for the longer-cycle, more complex projects.

By the way, on the right-shoring of MI tasks (moving the non-client facing anayltical tasks to lower cost countries), many of the largest tech vendors are on this march right now.

2. Sales Enablement. In IDC’s many surveys of Selling Productivity, we see that very high salaried sales executives spend a large amount of their time searching for or re-creating information that will support their preparation. OK, so what function in the organization that is NOT the sales function is good at finding and organizing and delivering information? Market Intelligence! I think it would be a natural for the MI area to provide greater and more cost effective support for many sales-preparation activities. As an example, almost every MI function has a portal for serving and managing information assets. Why couldn’t those same portals – or a version thereof – be used for sales assets? The time spent on searching for information assets is one of the most wasted and most common activities of salespeople.

Advisor pic Market Intelligence on the Move

Recently, I have been writing on similar transformations in related business units such as marketing operations, and we are also seeing some related changes taking place within sales operations. For every part of the marketing organization, the pressure is on to be efficient and drive positive business outcomes. IDC believes that there is a bright future ahead for MI leaders (and their teams) that understand the transformation that is under way and can begin that journey with concrete and bold new steps.

Worldwide Server Market Revenues Increase 13.2% in Third Quarter as Market Accelerates Further, According to IDC

IDC News Release, 12/1/10

According to the International Data Corporation (IDC) Worldwide Quarterly Server Tracker, factory revenue in the worldwide server market increased 13.2% year over year to $11.8 billion in the third quarter of 2010 (3Q10). This is the third consecutive quarter of year-over-year revenue growth and the fastest quarterly revenue growth since 2000, as market demand continued to improve around the world. Server unit shipments increased 13.1% year over year in 3Q10; however, server shipment growth moderated slightly over the strong 23.1% year-over-year shipment growth reported in the second quarter of 2010.

Volume systems experienced the sharpest improvement with year-over-year revenue increasing 22.8%, the fourth consecutive quarter of positive growth for the segment. Midrange server demand improved significantly with year-over-year growth of 19.8%, the segment’s second consecutive quarter of positive growth following nine quarters of decline and a sign that server market conditions are improving more broadly beyond volume systems. Demand for high-end enterprise systems continued to be soft, as revenue declined 10.4% when compared to 3Q09. This is the eighth consecutive quarter of contraction in the high-end enterprise server segment of the server market.

Read more

IDC Study Shows 2010 Brings About Changes for Tech Marketing Budgets

IDC NewLogo IDC Study Shows 2010 Brings About Changes for Tech Marketing Budgets

IDC, September 2010

Tech marketing budgets rebounded with a 3.7% increase this year. The rising popularity of inexpensive social media marketing tactics may be making an impact on marketing budgets. IDC reports that traditional ad media spend showed a huge decline, but digital marketing programs grew to represent a larger portion of media budgets.

Read the full report here.

Channel Marketing Automation – When CRM is not Enough

Gerald Murray Channel Marketing Automation – When CRM is not Enough
Gerald Murray, Research Manager, CMO Advisory Service

7/28/10

Whether you pursue a lead through direct sales or a partner it doesn’t really matter how you get the lead. But what happens next? With your direct sales, you track the nurturing process as the lead develops into an opportunity. You measure your sales reps by the number of meetings they get, the deals they close. You may even have a closed loop reporting process that shows the efficiency of your marketing and sales funnel.

With your partners, your lead gets passed off and … then what? Does the partner accept the lead? Do they follow up? Do their marketing outreach programs conform to your policies and expectations? How much time and how many touches does it take them to close? How do you decide which partner is qualified for which leads? How do you efficiently identify the productive partners, those that need encouragement and those that should be dropped?

Multi-Billion Dollar Channel Management Questions

These are critical questions that have a tremendous impact on businesses with significant indirect revenue. A recent IDC study of large IT companies found that on average channel revenue was $2.4B. It was generated by 34 channel marketing staff managing 8,500 active partners. That equates to $45 million of revenue per channel marketing staff member but only $1.2 million per partner. The dirty little secret – there are also on average approximately 19,000 inactive partners!

IDC Channel Management slide Channel Marketing Automation – When CRM is not Enough
Source: IDC’s 2010 Best Practices Study in Channel Marketing (n=13)

A Better Way

Your CRM and SFA are not going to answer any of the critical channel management questions – although many companies think their CRM system is where they should be “managing partners”. In fact, a partner management system fulfills a role more like an SFA – it tracks all the activity that occurs after the lead is generated. It should also facilitate the process of lead distribution – managing all the partner credentials and accreditations need to qualify for a particular lead. Then there’s deal registration where the partners accept the lead so that it is not poached by another partner or … ahem … the direct sales force. And when you consider some of the other requirements of partner management, the CRM fallacy becomes clear:

  • Recruitment and on-boarding
  • Training and development
  • Business Planning and Reporting
  • Compensation and Incentive program management
  • Marketing and Sales support

Are these capabilities that your CRM can provide? Your SFA? Would you even want them to? The answers should be no, no, and no. Don’t be thrown off by that last bullet – the marketing and sales outreach your partners require is very different than the corporate outreach that marketing operations is doing. They rebrand, reschedule, embed, and otherwise repurpose marketing content, making a direct translation from corporate marketing to partner marketing wholly inappropriate.

If you have (or want to have) a significant amount of revenue going through the channel, you need a dedicated partner relationship management (PRM) system to automate more than just marketing and sales activities. Don’t look to your CRM, SFA, or even the newer marketing automation vendors to provide you with the full set of capabilities necessary to effectively manage channels. Those solutions are focused on a very different set of requirements. They may have slideware and inch deep functionality, but that’s typically it. Do ask about integrating a PRM with these systems as reporting should roll up easily across direct and indirect sales.

A number of key capabilities to consider when implementing a platform channel marketing automation:

  • Manage partner profiles and contacts
  • Deliver and track training, certifications, etc.
  • Set business rules for lead distribution
  • Handle deal registration
  • Provide a single system of record for partner and channel management
  • Provide detailed performance reporting (12-month rolling review)
  • Track partner outreach campaigns
  • Manage market development funds (MDF) and co-op spend

With these issues on the table, it should be clear that automating channel marketing requires a dedicated, purpose-built solution. It will be costly and painful and meet substantially lower expectations otherwise.

Firm: Tech Companies Among Most Talked-About

MediaPost, 7/23/10

Not all news is good news, but any news is better than none. That, within reason, is a central tenet of media-measurement firm General Sentiment, whose second-quarter Media Value Report takes a look at which brands are benefiting — or not — from online conversations and news mentions. The report promulgates a dollar value for buzz, content and conversation.

The firm derives its “Purchase Equivalent” dollar value of a brand’s exposure from sentiment, frequency from news mentions and social dialogue. But it also differentiates between sheer volume and quality of talk: “Impact Value” assumes that all mentions are positive; “Perception Value” assigns positive value to positive mentions and negative value to the opposite thereof. That’s why BP, for example, is big in both lists.

Read more